The “don’t ask, don’t tell” (DADT) policy in the military
was repealed September 20, 2011. Prior to its enactment by President Clinton,
service members and others had said that having openly gay troops would harm
the military.
The Palm Center, which is part of the Williams Institute, an
independent think tank conducting research on sexual orientation and gender
identity law and public policy, at the University of California Los Angeles,
School of Law, conducts research on sexual minorities in the military. They convened
a panel of nine scholars, some of them professors at military academies, to
conduct a study that began six months after the policy ended and concluded at
about the one-year anniversary of the repeal. The panel interviewed opponents
and advocates of the repeal as well as active-duty service members. They
conducted on-site observations of four military units and reached out to 553 of
the nearly 1,200 flag officers who signed a 2009 letter saying the repeal would
undermine the military. Thirteen of these generals and admirals agreed to be
interviewed.
From the study: “Our conclusion, based on all of the
evidence available to us, is that DADT repeal has had no overall negative
impact on military readiness or its component dimensions, including cohesion,
recruitment, retention, assaults, harassment or morale. Although we identified
a few downsides that followed from the policy change, we identified upsides as
well, and in no case did negative consequences outweigh benefits. If anything,
DADT repeal appears to have enhanced the military’s ability to pursue its
mission.”
The research also showed that the repeal hadn’t been
responsible for any new wave of violence or physical abuse among service
members and appears to have enabled some gay troops to resolve disputes around
harassment in ways that were not possible before.
Then we have the
Boy Scouts of America, with its own version of DADT, a long-standing ban on “open
or avowed homosexuals” both in the leadership and the membership of the organization.
Many scouting families, in their own version of DADT went on with their
participation in the hop that the antiquated rule, which was at times ignored,
would be changed sooner rather than later.
But last week the
BSA made it clear that the old policy was still in force. Ryan Andresen, a
teenager who had completed all the requirements to become an Eagle Scout, was
denied the highest Scout honor because he recently told his friends and family
he is gay.
That local
decision adhered to the BSA's ban on membership for gays, a policy officially
recognized in 1991, upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2002 and strongly
reiterated by the organization in a July ruling. The rule, decided by a panel
in Texas, was clear: No openly gay members.
By way of full
disclosure, I was an Eagle Scout back in the day, and in fact was told at the
time that I was, for a while, the youngest Eagle Scout in the US. I have always
been pro-scouting and encouraged my children to participate. Scouting is good.
This policy is not. As a private organization, the Supreme Court ruled the BSA
could make its own rules, and I’m not questioning their right to do so – I’m
saying that having the right doesn’t make it right. I was a Scout in an era
when being gay wasn’t discussed, but there were always a few kids we knew were “that
way,” and it didn’t affect anything – not in camp, not at the National
Jamboree, and not in the troop, and it won’t affect anything now.
When Ryan’s mother Karen Andresen took
up the fight this week for her son, support was immediately forthcoming, with more than
339,000 people (as of Sunday) listed on a
Change.org petition urging Scout leaders to sign the teen's Eagle Scout
paperwork. It would be an act of moral courage for them to do so. If repealing
DADT didn’t harm the military, it won’t harm the Boy Scouts.
-->
No comments:
Post a Comment